I recently watched the movie The Danish Girl by director Tom Hooper, starring Alicia Vikander
and Eddie Redmayne. I found it poignant and often almost painful to watch as I
could strongly relate to much of the intense emotion expressed throughout. The
film is a love story, but not a typical one. (Warning, this is a long post and
does contain spoilers.)
The internal struggle she confronts between accepting
herself and trying to remain the husband her wife Gerda loves affected me most
deeply, because I know that struggle. The tension in the relationship between
Einar/Lili and Gerda forms the central conflict in the plot. Not only does Lili
face the choice to be herself or to remain the man her wife knows, Gerda also
faces the dilemma of encouraging and allowing Lili to live freely and fully,
knowing this will cost her her husband. Both characters vacillate because the
depth of their love draws them together, while the desire for authenticity
pushes them apart. Vikander and Redmayne both perform splendidly in this
regard, with the raw, deep emotion clearly portrayed. I nearly cried when Lili
accepts that she must be herself and cannot be the Einar that Gerda wants and
needs. I nearly cried again when Gerda affirms to the German doctor that she
too recognizes that Lili is, in fact, a woman, and later when she chooses to
journey to Germany to be with Lili as she recovers from the surgery that has
transformed her physically into the woman she already was. She remains with
Lili through the remainder of her life, choosing to reject the temptation to
seek her satisfaction as a woman somewhere else. This is powerful love.
Although the film so clearly portrays the challenges of
being transgender, not everyone in the transgender community applauded it. Many
were upset that the role of Einar/Lili was portrayed by a cisgender male. I
understand that concern and would definitely like to see more transgender
actors and actresses. However, to say that only someone who is transgender can
portray a transgender person well seems too limiting. A good actor or actress
enters into the fullness of their character in such a way as to become that
person, and I think Redmayne does a remarkable job (as does Vikander, who won
an Oscar for her performance). Furthermore, if we say only transgender people
should play transgender roles, then others could also say that only cisgender
actors and actresses can fill cisgender roles, which would significantly limit
the potential roles available to transgender actors/actresses. (Admittedly this
is hardly a problem at present.)
I loved the film, which I have tried to make clear already. However,
I was disappointed by the connection the film makes between being transgender
and having gender reassignment surgery. The film communicates the message that
becoming a real woman (or, by extension, a real man) for someone who is
transgender requires that one undergo surgical adjustment so that one’s anatomy
aligns with cisgender females and males. This perspective limits the definition
of transgender far too narrowly. As I have written previously in my post
Transgender 101, being transgender is not about one’s physical anatomy. Being
transgender is about recognizing (and hopefully in time accepting) that one’s
internal alignment doesn’t match the gender assigned at birth based solely on
anatomical features. Whether one undergoes surgery to change those features or
not does not make one a transgender female or male. One is regardless, simply
because that is who one is. I will not become more of a woman by undergoing
surgery, nor am I less of one because I choose not to (or for many transgender
people, lack the resources to do so.) Gender is not about anatomy. Hence it
troubled me when Lili proclaims “I’m a real woman” after her surgery. I would
say to her, “You were a real woman from birth. Your anatomy simply now aligns
more closely with that.”
I was also disappointed that Lili and Gerda fail to
recognize that they can have a full and fulfilling live together in a
relationship with a new dynamic. This relates more to my own perception though,
because if Gerda and Lili are both heterosexual women, then their sexual interest
and orientation will not be toward one another. But it tore me up to see them
feeling the tension that they could not remain together in partnership simply
because Lili was no longer the Einar of old. The love between them clearly
remained strong. Admittedly, in the cultural context of the time a lesbian
relationship would have been viewed by society as negatively as a gay one, but
the two might have been able to maintain an outward appearance of two women who
shared a home together, which is not uncommon in society and which has often
been the way in which lesbian women have had to disguise their relationship.
After the pain and turmoil of walking through Lili’s transformation together I
couldn’t bear the prospect of the two of them separating afterwards. In this I am decidedly viewing things through
the perspective of my own life, in which I wish that things between my
ex-spouse and I could have gone differently. Just as it is unfair for me to
project my expectations of a relationship on her, so it is unfair for me to
project them on Gerda and Lili. But the pain I felt seeing them struggle to
find a new dynamic while still holding such deep love for one another was quite
real.
As I watched the film, I felt thankful that I live in a time
with a greater understanding of what it means to be transgender. I appreciate
that the medical profession no longer (as a whole at least) views it as a
disorder that must be cured and that someone facing the internal struggle that
Lili did can now reach out and find professional counseling and medical help to
work through the struggle in a healthy manner. Unfortunately, as a society we
still have far to go in terms of understanding and acceptance of transgender
people, as evidenced by the renewed surge of legislative proposals that
penalize transgender people who live as themselves. We haven’t reverted to the
era of forcing transgender people to undergo harmful medical treatment to try
to “cure” them of their “problem” and society doesn’t as a rule lock them up as
perverts, but the mindset still persists and some seem to want to lead us
backwards in this regard.
Because it offers such a poignant portrayal of the struggle
transgender people face to embrace themselves, I highly recommend this film. It’s
not a perfect story and it shouldn’t be understood as definitive of the
transgender experience, but it can give insight into it. This story, just like
my story and those of every other transgender person, helps raise
understanding, awareness and acceptance and bring society to a place where
Lili, and Andrea, don’t face such huge hurdles to become themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment